'So Far As Is Reasonably Practicable' Meaning Explained For Health And Safety header image

25th June, 2018

'So Far As Is Reasonably Practicable' Meaning Explained For Health And Safety

If you spend some time looking at health and safety regulations, you will find the term 'so far as is reasonably practicable' - occasionally abbreviated to SFAIRP.

But what does this phrase mean for health and safety?

While this term is telling you to do something, it's not exactly clear what you should do, or how much. Should you do everything possible to reduce risk? What is reasonably practicable, and how do you decide if something is reasonably practicable?

Section 2. General duties of employers to their employees.

(1) It shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees.

Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (HSWA) imposes a duty on employers to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees.

In order to show you are complying with health and safety regulations, you need to demonstrate that you are reducing risk as far as is reasonably practicable, or as low as reasonably practicable. So how do we measure what is 'reasonable' and ensure that you are doing enough to minimise risks and protect your workforce?

Unsure what your risks are? Use the free risk calculator to create a risk list for your workplace.

Just because something is possible doesn't mean it is reasonably practicable to put it in place. But just because something is expensive or will take time to do, doesn't mean that you wouldn't be expected to do it.

Determining that risk has been reduced so far as is reasonably practicable, as required by the regulations, involves assessing the risk to be avoided and compare this with the sacrifice (in time, money and trouble) in taking measures against that risk.

As an employer, you are not expected to completely eliminate all of the risks that your workforce is exposed to. Everything carries a risk, even everyday activities like walking down the stairs or crossing the road.

It would be impossible to remove all of the risks all of the time, and importantly, it would not be reasonably practicable.

... in every case, it is the risk that has to be weighed against the measures necessary to eliminate the risk. The greater the risk, no doubt, the less will be the weight to be given to the factor of cost.

Edwards v The National Coal Board

In the ruling by the Court of Appeal in the Edwards v National Coal Board case described a scale of the risk and the measures to avert the risk, therefore in assessing whether you have complied with the duty 'so far as is reasonably practicable' involves a careful assessment of the balance between the two.

Only where the risk is insignificant in comparison with the sacrifice can the need for the measures and the duty to put them in place be discharged.

If the risk is very low and in order to eliminate the risk entirely you would need to spend a large proportion of money and time, then you would not be reasonably expected to put the control measure in place to eliminate the risk.

For example, if it would take a month and cost 1 million pounds to put in place a control measure that would eliminate the need for one person to work at height on a task that is only going to be carried out once, this would be grossly disproportionate and not reasonably practicable.

However, there could be other control measures that would be easier to put in place that would minimise the risk, and where these are proportionate they would be reasonably practicable to implement.

In the example above, you still need to put control measures in place to reduce the risk of that worker suffering a fall during the work at height activity and ensure the work can be carried out safely.

Remember to consider the hierarchy of risk control when deciding the best control measures to get your risks under control.

The greater the risk involved, the less consideration should be given to cost, and the more effort will be required to reduce the risk to comply with your duties.

The presumption will always be that the control measures in question should be implemented. The decision of the balance between the risk and the sacrifice will be weighted in favour of health and safety, rather than balancing the cost and benefits of measures. It is only where the control measures are grossly disproportionate to the risk that the measures can be ruled out.

More money time and trouble should be spent controlling higher risks, and it would be reasonably practicable to do so.

Construction sites are high hazards environments due to the nature of the work being carried out.

The HSE will not expect the working environment to be risk free should they inspect your site, either routinely or following an accident. What they will expect is that you have adequately assessed the risks and reduced them as low as can be expected.

high risk construction
More money, time and trouble should be spent controlling high risks

If you are inspected you need to be able to show that you have put in place suitable control measures that are proportionate to the risks involved.

In deciding what is proportionate and what measures come under 'as far as is reasonably practicable', you should apply common sense and relevant good practice guidance to the risk.

Good practice can often be found from professional bodies, trade publications and from the HSE.

Compliance with good practice will in most circumstances be sufficient to demonstrate that risks have been reduced as low as is reasonably practicable.

However, it is important to apply the guidance to your specific business activity and ask yourself if there are any further measures that could reduce the risk.

Where there are further measures highlighted, these should also be applied if on the test of the remaining risk vs. the time and resources to put the control in place you assess these control measures as proportionate.

Remember, unless the measures are grossly disproportionate and the risk insignificant in comparison, then the weighting should always be on putting the measures in place and reducing the risk.

Not only will this help you to comply with the law by applying measures that are 'reasonably practicable', it will also help keep your workforce safe and productive.

Use the free risk calculator to create a risk list, in priority order, for your workplace.

This article was written by Emma at HASpod. Emma has over 10 years experience in health and safety and a degree in construction management. She is NEBOSH qualified and a member of IOSH.

Better health and safety...

We are here to help you and your business put safety in everything.

Learn More

Recent posts like this...

50 Reasons Why You Should Wear And Use PPE

If you have ever struggled to get your team to wear and use their PPE correctly, or you are not sure why you need to wear PPE yourself, here are 50 reasons why you should wear and use PPE. After reading these 50 reasons, why wouldn't you wear PPE?

Read Post

The Difference Between Hazard And Risk Explained In Risk Assessment

What is the difference between a hazard and a risk? If you carry out a risk assessment, one of the first steps you will need to take is to identify the hazards, then you assess the risk. These two terms are often confused with each other, and in this blog post we explain the difference.

Read Post

RIDDOR Explained - Quick Facts And Simple Stats

What is RIDDOR? Find out with some quick facts and simple stats, explaining what RIDDOR is, what you need to do, and when. RIDDOR stands for the Reporting of Injuries Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations and applied to workplaces of all sizes across the UK.

Read Post

HASpod makes health and safety simple.

Learn More